A Policy Agenda for Legal Education and Training and the Fourth Industrial Revolution: The Case of England and Wales
While the full impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution remains uncertain, it is by now generally accepted that highly intelligent technologies and their applications – such as robotics, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, digitialisation, and big Data – will continue to fundamentally transform all aspects of our occupational and personal lives. Yet, in the realm of higher education policy and specifically with regard to non-STEM disciplines like law, thorough-going engagement with this most recent wave of technological development remains lacking. It is the aim of this article to set a policy agenda for legal education and training that is sensitive to the opportunities and potential negative outfall of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (now exacerbated by COVID-19), while also taking into consideration the distinctive nature of legal education and training in England and Wales. Set against the higher education policy landscape of England and Wales, a number of concrete recommendations are made for bringing legal education and training into the age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. These include, for example, a call for the radical transformation of the traditional, linear, and monodisciplinary LLB degree, addressing current and projected skills gaps and skills shortages by way of, inter alia, curriculum reform, and working towards greater mobility of law graduates between different legal jurisdictions and also within one jurisdiction but amongst different roles. These changes are necessary as legal education and training in England and Wales currently leave law graduates ill-equipped for the future labour market and do not adequately value and build on the job-tasks that legal professionals uniquely supply.
Acemoglu, Daron. “Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, no 4, (1998): 1055-1089.
Acemoglu, Daron and Autor, David. “Chapter Twelve: Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, edited by David Card and Orley Ashenfelter, 1044-1166 Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2011.
Arntz, Melanie and Gregory, Terry and Zierahn, Ulrich. The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis. (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 189, 2016). https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5jlz9h56dvq7-en.pdf?expires=1578172632&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=A098B5E211CAC63D4D88A0DB93857F8F.
Autor, David H. “The ‘task approach’ to labour markets: An overview.” Journal for Labour Market Research 46, issue 3, 2013: 185-199.
Autor, David. “Polanyi’s paradox and the shape of employment growth.” NBER Working Paper Series 20485, September 2014). https://www.nber.org/papers/w20485.pdf.
Autor, David H. “Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation and anxiety.” MIT IDE Research Brief 2016.07, 2016: 1-5.
Autor, David H. and Levy, Frank and Murnane, Richard J. “The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, no 4, 2003: 1279-1333.
Autor, David H. and Levy, Frank and Murnane, Richard J. “Computer-based technological change and skill.” In Low-Wage America – How Employers are Reshaping Opportunity in the Workplace, edited by Eileen Appelbaum and Annette Bernhardt and Richard J. Murnane, 121-154. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2006.
Beelen, Jos and Jones, Elspeth. “Redefining Internationalisation at Home.” In The European Higher Education Area: Between Critical Reflections and Future Policies, edited by Adrian Curaj et al., 59-72. Heidelberg: Springer, 2015.
Boniface, Richard and Whalley, Graham and Goodwin David. Mapping the Higher Technical Education Landscape. 2018. http://www.gatsby.org.uk/uploads/education/reports/pdf/mapping-the-higher-technical-landscape-final-version.pdf.
Boon, Andrew and Webb, Julian. “Legal Education and Training in England and Wales: Back to the Future?.” Journal of Legal Education 58, no 1, 2008: 79 – 121.
Brescia, Raymond H. “Law and Social Innovation: Lawyering in the Conceptual Age.” Albany Law Review 80, 2016/17: 101-175.
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D.E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G.S., Ho, A.D. and Seaton, D. “Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC.” Research & Practice in Assessment 8, 2013: 13-15.
Brynjolfsson, Erik and McAfee, Andrew. The Second Machine Age – Work, Progress and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2014.
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (UK). Industrial Strategy: Building a Britain fit for the future. (Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (UK) 27 November 2017). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/664563/industrial-strategy-white-paper-web-ready-version.pdf.
Department for Education (UK). “Policy Papers and Consultations.” https://www.gov.uk/search/policy-papers-and-consultations?organisations%5B%5D=department-for-education&parent=department-for-education.
Department of Education (UK). Policy Paper Improving Adult Basic Skills: Equality Impact Assessment. (Department of Education (UK), April 2019). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/796393/Improving_adult_basic_skills_-_equality_impact_assessment.pdf.
Department of Education (UK). Policy Paper Realising the Potential of Technology in Education: A Strategy for Education Providers and the Technology Industry. (Department of Education (UK) April 2019). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/791931/DfE-Education_Technology_Strategy.pdf.
Department for Education (UK). Policy Paper Review of Higher Technical Education: Glossary of Terms. (Department for Education (UK) 8 July 2019). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/higher-technical-education-current-system-and-case-for-change.
Department for Education (UK). Policy Paper Higher Technical Education: The Current System and the Case for Change. (Department for Education (UK) 8 July 2019). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/814938/Higher_technical_education_case_for_change.pdf.
Department for Education (UK). Research Report Employer Skills Survey 2017 (Department for Education (UK) August 2018). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/746493/ESS_2017_UK_Report_Controlled_v06.00.pdf.
Department for Education (UK). Unlocking Talent, Fulfilling Potential – A Plan for Improving Social Mobility through Education. (Department for Education (UK) December 2017). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/667690/Social_Mobility_Action_Plan_-_for_printing.pdf.
Department for Education (UK). Policy Paper National Retraining Scheme. (Department for Education (UK), 19 July 2019, updated 16 October 2019). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-retraining-scheme/national-retraining-scheme.
Department for Education (UK). Policy Paper National Retraining Scheme: Associated Projects. (Department for Education (UK), 19 July 2019, updated 16 October 2019). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-retraining-scheme/national-retraining-scheme-associated-projects.
Department for Education (UK). Policy Paper Functional Skills English and Mathematics Subject Content: Equality Impact Assessment. (Department for Education (UK), February 2018). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/682822/Functional_Skills_Subject_Content_Equality_Impact_Assessment.pdf.
Field, Simon. The Missing Middle: Higher Technical Education in England. London: The Gatsby Charitable Foundation, 2018.
Frey, Carl Benedict and Osborne, Michael. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation?. Oxford: Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, 2013. https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf.
Gleason, Nancy W. (ed.). Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
Goos, M., Manning, A and Salomons, A. “Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring.” The American Economic Review 104(8), 2014: 2509-2526
Green, Francis. “Employee Involvement, Technology and Evolution in Job Skills: A Task-Based Analysis.” Industrial and Labour Relations Review 65, no 1, 2012: 36-67.
Gregory, Terry and Salomons, Anna and Zierahn, Ulrich. “Racing with or against the machine? Evidence from Europe.” Discussion Paper No. 16-053 Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH (Centre for European Economic Research) July 2016. http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp16053.pdf.
Jann, Werner and Wegrich, Kai. “Theories of the Policy Cycle.” In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis – Theory, Politics, and Methods, edited Frank Fischer and Gerald J. Miller and Mara S. Sidney 43-62, 44-45, Boca Raton, FL (USA): CRC Press, an imprint from the Taylor and Francis Group, 2007.
Katz, Daniel Martin. “Quantitative Legal Prediction – or – how I Learned to Stop Worrying and start preparing for the data-driven future of the legal services industry.” Emory Law Journal 62, 2013: 909-966
Keynes, John Maynard. “Economic possibilities for our grandchildren.” In Essays in Persuasion, John Maynard Keynes, 358-373. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1931.
Menkel-Meadow Carrie. “Aha? Is Creativity Possible in Legal Problem Solving and Teachable in Legal Education?.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 6, 2001: 97-144.
Mokyr, Joel and Vickers, Chris, and Ziebarth, Nicolas L. “The History of Technological Anxiety and Economic Growth: Is This Time Different?.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 29, no 3, 2015: 31-50.
Morgan, Jamie. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution could lead to a Dark Future.” (The Conversation, 9 January 2020). https://theconversation.com/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-could-lead-to-a-dark-future-125897?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20for%20January%2010%202020%20-%201505114325&utm_content=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20for%20January%2010%202020%20-%201505114325+CID_7822f43ad4eb934b8b340f04ef884093&utm_source=campaign_monitor_uk&utm_term=The%20fourth%20industrial%20revolution%20could%20lead%20to%20a%20dark%20future.
National Audit Office (UK). Delivering STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Skills for the Economy HC 716 Session 2017-2019. (National Audit Office (UK), 17 January 2018). https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Delivering-STEM-Science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-skills-for-the-economy.pdf.
Nordhaus, William D. Are We Approaching an Economic Singularity? Information Technology and the Future of Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper Series Nr. 21547, 2015. https://www.nber.org/papers/w21547.pdf.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). PISA 2018 Global Competence (2018). http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2018-global-competence.htm.
Pajarinen, Mika and Rouvinen Petri. “Computerization Threatens One Third of Finnish Employment.” ETLA Muistiot Brief No. 22, 2014. http://pub.etla.fi/ETLA-Muistio-Brief-22.pdf
Ricardo, David. On The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: John Murray, Albemarle-Street, 1817.
Schallmo, Daniel R.A. and Williams, Christopher A. Digital Transition Now! Guiding the Successful Digitalisation of your Business Model. SpringerBriefs in Business, London: Springer International Publishing, 2018.
Schwab, Klaus. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2016.
Siddiqi, Lutfey. Confronting the Macroeconomic Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution LSE Business Review. 2019. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2018/01/17/confronting-the-macroeconomic-challenges-of-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/.
Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/who-we-are/what-sra-about/.
Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). A New Route to Qualification: The Solicitors Qualifying Examination. (October 2016). https://www.sra.org.uk/globalassets/documents/sra/consultations/sqe-summary-document.pdf?version=4a1ad1.
Tajti, Tibor. “The impact of technology on access to law and the concomitant repercussions: past, present, and the future (from the 1980s to present time).” Uniform Law Review 24, issue 2, 2019: 396-429.
The Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd. The Automation Readiness Index: Who is ready for the coming wave of automation?. (2018). http://www.automationreadiness.eiu.com/static/download/PDF.pdf.
The Economist. The Fourth Industrial Revolution – Its Impact on Economic Growth, Innovation and the Future of Work in the Middle East. 2019. https://pages.eiu.com/rs/753-RIQ-438/images/4IR%20Event%20Report_FINAL.pdf.
The Law Society (UK). Research to Inform Workforce Planning and Career Development in Legal Services. 2019. https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/support-services/research-trends/research-to-inform-workforce-planning-and-career-development-in-legal-services/.
The Law Society. Capturing Technological Innovation in Legal Services. 2017. https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/support-services/research-trends/capturing-technological-innovation-report/.
United Kingdom Commission for Employment and Skills (UKCES). Working Futures 2014-2024 Evidence Report 100. 2016. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/513801/Working_Futures_final_evidence_report.pdf.
Williams, Matthew and Buzzeo, Jonathan and Cockett, James and Capuano, Stella and Takala, Helena. Research to Inform Workforce Planning and Career Development in Legal Services. Institute for Employment Studies (IES) Report. 2018.) https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/support-services/research-trends/research-to-inform-workforce-planning-and-career-development-in-legal-services/.
Woolf, Beverly Park. Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionising e-learning. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, an imprint of Elsevier, 2009.
Copyright (c) 2021 Andra le Roux-Kemp
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).