Mental Health Law for the 21st Century?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19164/ijmhcl.v1i12.167Abstract
Lord Shaftesbury complained that it took him ‘seventeen years of labour and anxiety’ to get the Lunacy Act 1845 onto the statute books. The revision of the Mental Health Act 1983 is also turning out to be a long and difficult process, both for Government and for those that it calls ‘stakeholders’ in mental health services. What follows does not seek to examine that process, although it relies heavily on the public sessions of the Joint Committee on the draft Mental Health Bill (hereafter ‘the Joint Committee’). Nor will I attempt to summarise the Mental Health Act Commission’s public comments on the draft Bill of 2004, which are readily available. My conclusions, especially insofar as they exhibit a certain pessimism over the future direction of mental health law, are a personal view rather than one which is necessarily held by the MHAC.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
