The Draft Mental Incapacity Bill
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19164/ijmhcl.v1i10.142Abstract
Despite the general agreement with the Law Commission’s assessment of the failings of the current system for decision-making on behalf of people who lack the capacity to make decisions for themselves, the steps towards achieving comprehensive reform, as recommended in its report, Mental Incapacity, has been a protracted process. Mental Incapacity was followed, two years later, by a consultation paper – 'Who Decides? Making Decisions on Behalf of Mentally Incapacitated People' – in which the Government sought views on the Law Commission’s recommendations for reform. In October 1999, the Lord Chancellor’s Department published 'Making Decisions', which set out the Government’s proposal for reform, "in the light of the responses to the consultation paper Who Decides".
In June of last year the reform process moved to a significant stage with the publication of the Government’s draft Mental Incapacity Bill (‘the Draft Bill’). This set out proposals to reform the law: "in order to improve and clarify the decision making process for those aged 16 and over who are unable to make decisions for themselves." Thus provisions set out in the Draft Bill are based on the Law Commission’s recommendations.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
