Computer Says No: Enforcing divorce upon persons who changed their sex in Europe and South Africa

Authors

  • Lize Mills

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19164/ijgsl.v1i1.994

Abstract

As is the case with marriage, divorce should be entered into freely and voluntarily. The State should not demand that a marriage be ended if neither one of the spouses wishes for it to be terminated. Yet, several countries still impose such an obligation in instances where one or both of the parties to the marriage changed their sex during the existence of the marriage, in order for such a person to attain legal recognition of the sex change. This article analyses some of the case law in Europe and South Africa where the courts have had to intercede in instances in which differential treatment was being justified in the name of so-called pragmatism. It examines some of the possible reasons for imposing this obligation upon married couples and the effect that this requirement has on their lives. Furthermore, it explores why it is incorrect to require the termination of marriage after a change of sex, how genderism and transphobia has caused differential and discriminatory treatment of transsexual persons, and how institutional bias and a lack of appreciation for the lived reality of people who do not necessarily fit into categories of generated systems, continue to negate the human rights of some humans.

References

Borgesius, F. Z., 2018. Discrimination, artificial intelligence and algorithmic decision-making. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/discrimination-artificial-intelligence-and-algorithmic-decision-making/1680925d73, last accessed 27 September 2019.

BVerfG, Order of the First Senate of 27 May 2008 (2008).

de Ru, H., 2010. The Civil Union Act 17 of 2006: A transformative Act of a substandard product of a failed conciliation between social, legal and political issues. Journal of Contemporary Roman Dutch Law,

Volume 73, p. 553.

De Vos, P. & Barnard, J., 2007. Same sex marriage, civil unions and domestic partnerships: Critical reflections on an ongoing saga. South African Law Journal, pp. 795-826.

Department of Home Affairs, 2019. Media Statement on Choice of Surname for Persons who Marry. Available at: http://www.dha.gov.za/index.php/statements-speeches/1274-media-statement-on-choice-of-surname-for-persons-who-marry, last accessed 27 September 2019.

Dunne, P., 2018. The Conditions for Obtaining Legal Gender Recognition: A Human Rights Evaluation. s.l.:Trinity College Dublin School of Law.

Farber, T., 2019. SA's homophobia report card: Great in theory, horrible in practice. Available at: https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2019-03-20-sas-homophobia-report-card-great-in-theory-horrible-in-practice/, last accessed 27 September 2019.

Graham-Siegenthaler, B. E., 1998. Principles of Marriage Recognition Applied to Same-Sex Marriage Recognition in Switzerland and Europe. Creighton Law Review, pp. 121-146.

Grobler, R., 2019. Women lash out at home affairs after surname changes. Available at: https://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/p3-we-want-our-surnames-back-women-lash-out-at-home-affairs-20190725, last accessed 27 September 2019.

Hämäläinen v. Finland, judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2014, case number 37359/09, available at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-145768%22]} last accessed on 20 July 2020.

Hamilton, F., 2019. Rights for LGBTQ persons: MB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. Family Law, pp. 54-56.

Henzel, L., 2016. Back me up! Rights of Trans Children under the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Available at: https://docplayer.net/123930978-Back-me-up-rights-of-trans-children-under-the-convention-on-the-rights-of-the-child.html, last

accessed 20 July 2020.

Hill, D. B. & Willoughby, B. L., 2005. The Development and Validation of the Genderism and Transphobia Scale. Sex Roles, Volume 53, pp. 531-544.

Hollingsworth, J., 2019. Taiwan legalizes same-sex marriage in historic first for Asia. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/17/asia/taiwan-same-sex-marriage-intl/index.html, last accessed 20 July 2020.

Hsu, J. W., 2013. Taiwan Reinstates Transgender Couple’s Marriage.

Available at: https://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2013/08/09/taiwan-reinstates-transgender-couples-marriage/, last accessed 9 September 2019.

International Commission of Jurirsts, 2012. No. 11/08743, 1453, 12/00535, Cour d’Appel de Rennes, France (16 October 2012). Available at: https://www.icj.org/sogicasebook/no-1108743-1453-1200535-cour-dappel-de-rennes-france-16-october-2012/, last accessed 20 July 2020.

International Commission of Jurists, 2008. 1 BvL 10/05, Federal Constitutional Court of Germany (27 May 2008). Available at: https://www.icj.org/sogicasebook/1-bvl-1005-federal-constitutional-court-of-germany-27-may-2008, last accessed 29 August 2019.

Köhler, R. & Ehrt, J., 2016. Legal Gender Recognition in Europe. Available at: https://tgeu.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Toolkit16LR.pdf, last accessed 29 August 2019.

MB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 June 2018, ECLI:EU:C:2018:492, available at http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=203337&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first∂=1&ci, last accessed 20 July 2020.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary, 2019. "Transphobia", s.l.: s.n.

Morgan, J., 2015. Attorneys for the Rights of the Child Newsletter Academic OneFile. Available at: http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A466617464/AONE?u=27uos&sid=AONE&xid=a823ce1f, last accessed 10 October 2018.

Open Society Foundations, 2014. License to be Yourself: Marriage and Forced Divorce Refworld. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/55b631654.pdf, last accessed 19 August 2019.

Parliamentary Counsel Office, 2013. Marriage (Definition of Marriage) Amendment Act 2013. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20150914173443/http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2013/0020/latest/whole.html, last accessed 29 August 2019.

Sharpe, A., 2012. Transgender marriage and the legal obligation to disclose gender history. Modern Law Review, 75(1), pp. 33-53.

Sloth-Nielsen, J., 2019. KOS v Minister of Home Affairs and its relevance to the law of marriage in South Africa. South African Journal on Human Rights, 18 September.35(2).

Sørlie, A., 2017. Governing (trans)parenthood – The tenacious hold of biological connection and heterosexuality. In: D. Otto, ed. Queering International Law Possibilities, Alliances, Complicities, Risks. London: Routledge, p. 290.

The World Professional Association for Transgender Health, 2017. WPATH Identity Recognition Statement. Available at: https://www.wpath.org/media/cms/Documents/Web%20Transfer/Policies/WPATH%20Identity%20Recognition%20Statement%2011.15.17.pdf, last accessed 20 July 2020.

Trans Rights Europe & Central Asia, 2019. Index 2019.

Available at: https://tgeu.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/index_TGEU2019.pdf, last accessed 6 June 2019.

Vos, P. d., 2019. Patriarchy by any other (man’s) name.

Available at: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2019-08-06-patriarchy-by-any-other-mans-name/, last accessed 27 September 2019.

Wild, S., 2019. Home Affairs requires husbands to give women consent to change their names and it's an affront. Available at: https://www.news24.com/Columnists/GuestColumn/home-affairs-requires-husbands-to-give-women-consent-to-change-their-names-and-its-an-affront-20190724?fbclid=IwAR0ziPh2VO8s9XihiTapL2KpwFp18Om9oUoPvxBzPXQczjCyfMhBg2RYJj8, last accessed 27 September 2019

Downloads

Published

2020-07-30

Issue

Section

Articles